Selected work

Proof, without the bylines.

Moat is a done for you newsletter studio. We have written daily and weekly newsletters for operators, founders and publishers for three years. Here is what that work looks like, how it gets made, and a full issue you can read start to finish.

Why there are no client names on this page.

We ghostwrite. The byline belongs to the client, and so does the decision to talk about who writes it. Naming them here to win your business would tell you exactly how we would treat your name later.

Every engagement below is a real one, with the true subscriber counts and no logos. On a call Louis will open the live newsletters and walk you through them.

3 years
Writing and sending newsletters as a studio
100+
Operators, founders and publishers served
400,000+
Subscribers on the largest daily newsletter we have written
Daily
The cadence on the newsletters that send every weekday morning
Engagements

Four newsletters, described plainly.

The audiences and the cadences differ. The studio behind them does not. We took every subscriber count from the publication's own public page.

Daily briefing

An AI briefing for business leaders

A weekday morning email that turns the day's AI news into a briefing a non technical executive can act on. A reader gets it in five minutes with no jargon. We ran the full editorial pipeline, from sourcing through fact check to send, and produced a twice weekly podcast alongside it.

Audience400,000+ subscribers
CadenceMonday to Friday
ScopeFull editorial and send
Daily markets

A markets and investing newsletter

This one lands before the US market opens. We tie every claim back to a primary source, because the readers hold positions based on it. We handle sourcing, drafting, the numbers, and a fact check gate that has to pass before anything sends.

Audience150,000+ readers
CadenceEvery market morning
ScopeFull editorial and send
Alerts

A small cap alert newsletter

This is the sister publication to the markets newsletter, built for speed rather than depth. It sends short form alerts by email and SMS when a stock moves, written to a house format that keeps the disclosure and the ad placement consistent every time.

FormatEmail and SMS
Cadence3 to 5 times a week
ScopeDrafting and format control
Creator

A weekly newsletter for a tech creator

One creator with a large social following needed a weekly essay that sounded exactly like him. Voice was the whole job. We also produce the social assets that pull people back to the list each week.

AudienceCreator's own list
CadenceWeekly, fixed send time
ScopeNewsletter and social assets

Alongside these, the studio has written newsletters and long form content for B2B SaaS, robotics, consulting, wealth management and independent coaches.

Read the writing

A full issue, unedited.

Client issues are theirs to publish, so here is one of ours. This went out in Louis's own newsletter. It is the house style with nobody else's voice on top of it.

Digital Gravity By Louis Shulman
Today's Tip: Be Clear, Not Clever

"I want to run ads for my business."

If you are anything like me, the gap between the first time you think that and your first ad going live is far, far too long.

Let me help you close it.

I have spent the past week at Network School, a startup community of hundreds of founders on an island near Singapore. Some are here just to lock in. Many are beginners chasing their first dollar online.

So many of them are building in stealth. Always a few weeks out from launching.

Let me save you the weeks.

If you are a beginner, there is no benefit to stealth.

Your first product should not take weeks to build.

Your first ad should not take weeks to film.

In the sent issue, a chart sits here.

There is an asymmetry in giving. Very few moments let one or two minutes of my time shave years of pain off someone's life. This is one of them.

(And yes, there is an unsubscribe button in real life.)

So question the requirements.

Why are you in stealth? What uncomfortable truth are you avoiding? People love to invent excuses. Stealth is usually just a nicer word for scared.

Two questions cut through all of it.

One is Elon's: make the requirement less dumb. Attach every rule to a person who will put their name on it. "The ad has to look professional." Says who? What does professional even mean?

The other is simpler still: says who? Most of what you believe about your limits comes from a voice that was never yours.

Here is what actually decides whether it works.

People buy when they believe they need the thing and trust you to deliver it.

People click when you spark curiosity by tapping a desire they already have.

That is the list. Lighting is not on it. The perfect script is not on it. Your 20th take is not on it.

In the sent issue, a screenshot of the ad sits here.

Look at Cole Gordon. He reportedly does around $30M a year in sales coaching. His ad is a red box, white text, and one guarantee: we pack your calendar or you pay nothing.

No polish. No cleverness. A clear promise to the right person.

Because the offer is the business.

The font is not the business. The lighting is not the business. The offer is.

So make the ugly ad. Ship the simple product. Turn it on today, not in three weeks.

Be clear, not clever.

The issue runs under 500 words and carries one idea and one instruction. We hold client newsletters to the same limit.

How the work gets made

The part most studios do not have.

Writing is the visible half. The reason a daily newsletter can go out every morning for years without drifting or repeating itself is the pipeline underneath it.

1

Voice DNA before a single draft

Ninety minutes with you produces a written voice document, an eight week topic queue and the template. Every writer and every tool works from that document, so the newsletter sounds like you and not like whoever was on shift.

2

A human picks the sources first

Nothing gets drafted until a person has chosen and approved the primary sources for that issue. Drafting first and finding support afterwards is how newsletters end up confidently wrong.

3

Every claim checked against the fetched source

We pull the actual page and match the claim against it, rather than trusting memory or another article's summary. On finance newsletters that is the difference between a good issue and a liability.

4

Checked against your own archive

We compare each issue against everything already sent, so the same story does not run twice under a new headline. A genuine new development still runs. A rerun does not.

5

A QA gate that stops the send

We check formatting, links, dates, voice and facts before send, and a failure stops the issue rather than printing a warning nobody reads. You approve. Then it goes.

Next step

Want to see the live newsletters?

Email Louis directly, or book thirty minutes and he will screen share the real issues, the archives and the numbers behind them.